Lightroom Tip of the Week (7): fading a Lightroom Preset

by MoreThanWords on november 15, 2009

lrtip
This is a video remake of an older tip I did when the blog was still in Dutch. I get asked this question quite a lot during the workshops: ‘Is there a way to ‘fade’ the effect of a preset?’.
Well, there is no real ‘fade’ slider in Lightroom, so you’re left with one of two options: you try to figure out what it is the preset does (and what sliders it changes by how much) and then fiddle with those sliders. This is however a cumbersome method, as some presets can be fairly complex, change dozens of sliders and even use localised edits such as graduated filters.
You could also open the preset in a text editor, to try to find out the settings used, but this is not for the faint-hearted!
An easier and highly controllable, albeit more storage-hungry way of doing things is presented in the following movie. If you know of other ways, please share them in the comments.
P.S. Those of you who are new to the blog might also be interested in the ‘Look ma, only Lightroom’ video I did a while back, on how to make a print layout in Lightroom.

{ 2 trackbacks }

Twitted by sherri_meyer
04.12.2009 at 02:35
Lightroom Tip of the Week: the many uses of a Virtual Copy — morethanwords.be
10.03.2010 at 18:36

{ 22 comments… read them below or add one }

Joop Snijder 15.11.2009 at 11:45

I was wondering if Smart Objects can help you with non-destructive fading of the effect. You can open the original and the virtual copy with the preset as Smart Objects in PS. Now you need an extra step to copy one Smart Object to the other.

Now you can do the same trick, but after opening the TIF file you can readjust the Camera Raw settings. The only disadvantage is the fact that you need a XMP settings of your presets if you want to apply a new preset to your virtual copy.

But this is a non-destructive way of fading your preset.

Let me know what you think about this technique.

Jerome 17.11.2009 at 16:57

Very handy trick indeed! Thanks, was looking for such a ‘fading’ for ages :)

John 17.11.2009 at 20:24

This is great info…thanks.

Dariela 18.11.2009 at 02:18

Great tip! Thanks so much. I will definitely try it!

Terra 18.11.2009 at 16:59

Wow! This is SO quick!!!! Thank you for saving me so much time and more creativity options!!!!!

Serge Van Cauwenbergh 18.11.2009 at 23:00

Thanks for this awesome tip! Very helpful!

Jim Lewis 19.11.2009 at 00:31

Another advantage to this method is that you have the control to paint in the effect through a layer mask. Great tip!

MoreThanWords 20.11.2009 at 16:15

@ Jim, thanks for adding that… I forgot to do so in the video.

Thomas 28.11.2009 at 14:42

XLnt tip.. thank you!

Phill 01.12.2009 at 11:08

Hey – the Lightroom Fan page just posted the YouTube video directly so you’re probably getting a lot of love there! I didn’t think about doing this – thank you. Although looking at the filename -edit-edit-edit2.tif I guess you have a lot of diskspace for so many .tifs lol!

MoreThanWords 01.12.2009 at 15:46

@ Phil: I guess I had to do a couple of takes of the video and forgot to delete the previous versions :-) But it’s right: it is a disk-space consuming method. However it is fast, and I like to think that time is more precious than disk space :-)

Moore Exposure 04.12.2009 at 22:37

Thanks… very helpful! : )

Jason Joseph 16.12.2009 at 09:00

I do this all the time. However… I add layer masks for further control. Giving me a true nondestructive file I can tweak and re-tweak

MoreThanWords 26.12.2009 at 20:19

@ Jason: another thing you can do is, after you’ve set the right ‘mix’ between the two using the opacity slider and layer masking, turn those two layers into a Smart Object, and work from there with smart filters :-)

Modesto 27.12.2009 at 08:22

Muchas Gracias Amigo,

Great tip !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Patrick 31.12.2009 at 02:17

great tip, but for some reason i don’t get the option to choose “open as layers in photoshop”

Any help wellcome

Patrick

MoreThanWords 31.12.2009 at 17:27

@ Patrick: do you use CS3 or CS4? It might have something to do with not running the latest version of Photoshop. If you do run CS4, then try updating your Camera Raw to the latest version (via Update in the Photoshop Help menu…)

Patrick 02.01.2010 at 01:02

I run the CS3, might there be the problem ?
Thanks for your reaction
Patrick

MoreThanWords 02.01.2010 at 05:27

@ Patrick:
Normally, it should also work with CS3. Try first of all to download the latest available Camera Raw Version for Photoshop CS3 (run Photoshops update feature). If that does not work, it might be because your camera is more recent than supported by Camera Raw. You might want to try to convert – just for testing at first – a couple of files to DNG when you import them to Lightroom, or try the ‘Open as Layers’ command on two JPG’s or PSD’s (so any non-camera-specific raw file).
If that still doesn’t work, you might want to try downloading the trial version of CS4… That should work…

Patrick 04.01.2010 at 22:50

i have a Canon 5D, not exactly the newest… but i’ll try the tips you gave.

MoreThanWords 08.01.2010 at 10:06

@ Patrick: the 5D is still a pretty good camera, even in these days… Only too bad about the somewhat older AF system…

Patrick 09.01.2010 at 21:43

i love my 5D, dont worry

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

UA-12607314-1